Farms.com Home   News

Canada faces challenge in NAFTA renegotiations

Canada faces challenge in NAFTA renegotiations

American government wants Canada to remove class 7 milk products from supply management system

By Kaitlynn Anderson
Staff Writer
Farms.com

The Canadian government is facing another hurdle in the ongoing NAFTA discussions.

In addition to asking Canada to phase out supply management in the dairy sector over the next ten years, the U.S. wants its northern neighbour to immediately remove class 7 milk products from its current system, a recent policy note from Agri-Food Economic Systems said.

Currently, Canada can price products in this class – like skim milk powder – at a competitive level with imports of this type in the domestic market, Al Mussell, research lead and founder of Agri-Food Economic Systems, told Farms.com today.

However, this situation was not always the case.

“Prior to implementing class 7, Canada would export skim milk powder until it hit the cap for subsidized exports,” Mussell said. “As a result, the (quantity) of powder export didn’t change much from year to year.”

So, Americans didn’t face much competition when exporting their milk protein isolates to Canada.

Once Canada created this class, the products no longer fell under the World Trade Organization’s definition of subsidized exports.

Then, the country’s export levels rose due to its increased access to the world market. This shift has created some tension with the U.S.

If Canada accepts the U.S. demands and eliminates class 7, the outcomes could negatively affect domestic dairy farmers.

Producers would face the “challenge of finding a home for the excess skim products in Canada,” Mussel said.

While producers could re-route some skim milk powder through class 4M for animal feed, they would earn a significantly lower price – an estimated 10 per cent of the world market price – for their products, Mussell said.

Alternatively, the country would “have to make major quota cutbacks to try and get the skim market to balance domestically,” he said.

By eliminating the supply management system, Canadian producers may end up in the same situation as farmers facing overproduction in other dairy-exporting countries, like the U.S., Australia, New Zealand and members of the European Union, the note said. These countries adopted alternative policy instruments to stabilize production but they were not successful.

Canadian policies are not the culprit of these countries’ surpluses, the note explained.

“World dairy markets are some of the most distorted markets in agricultural trade,” the note said. “All of the major dairy exporters have been suffering from overproduction. These issues … would have existed regardless of Canada.”

 

 

Ronnie Chua/iStock/Getty Images Plus photo


Trending Video

Evolution of Beef Cattle Farming

Video: Evolution of Beef Cattle Farming

The Clear Conversations podcast took to the road for a special episode recorded in Nashville during CattleCon, bringing listeners straight into the heart of the cattle industry. Host Tracy Sellers welcomed rancher Steve Wooten of Beatty Canyon Ranch in Colorado for a wide-ranging discussion that blended family history and sustainability, particularly as it relates to the future of beef production.

Sustainability emerged as a central theme of the conversation, a word that Wooten acknowledges can mean very different things depending on who you ask. For him, sustainability starts with the soil. Healthy soil produces healthy grass, which supports efficient cattle capable of producing year after year with minimal external inputs. It’s an approach that equally considers vegetation, animal efficiency, and long-term profitability.

That philosophy aligned naturally with Wooten’s involvement in the U.S. Roundtable for Sustainable Beef, where he served as a representative for the Colorado Cattlemen’s Association. The roundtable brings together the entire beef supply chain—from producers to retailers—along with universities, NGOs, and allied industries. Its goal is not regulation, Wooten emphasized, but collaboration, shared learning, and continuous improvement.