Farms.com Home  › Ag Industry News

U.S. Clean Energy Push Faces Setback

Jun 24, 2025
By Farms.com

Federal Cuts Threaten Carbon Capture and Hydrogen Growth

Republican lawmakers are pushing for deep cuts in energy programs that support fossil fuel innovation and clean technology development. 

These proposed reductions include federal funding for hydrogen energy, carbon capture and storage (CCUS), and research on reducing methane emissions.

Critics say these moves could harm the U.S. fossil fuel industry’s future, as the world shifts toward lower-carbon technologies.

The European Union and China are already investing heavily in hydrogen and CCUS. A report warns the EU may overtake the U.S. in carbon capture by 2040.

Tax credits like 45Q for carbon capture remain in current bills, but the hydrogen tax credit 45V is at risk of being eliminated. This could slow clean hydrogen development, which is vital for producing fuels with lower emissions.

Experts highlight that without these technologies; American energy exports may become less competitive. The EU will soon penalize high-emission imports. China now leads in hydrogen production technologies, having grown from 10% to over 60% global market share in just a few years.

Rudra Kapila, a clean energy advocate, noted, “If the U.S. decides to go back a couple of steps on this, Europe and Asia will gladly take the lead by leaps and bounds.”

Despite the cuts, fossil fuel supporters believe in using domestic resources with advanced technology. Some argue CCUS is costly, while others see it as necessary for future energy needs.

The debate highlights a critical moment for American energy policy. Decisions today will shape whether the U.S. leads or lags in a cleaner energy future.


Trending Video

High Diesel Prices Pressure Farmers Ahead of Midterm Elections

Higher diesel and fertilizer prices are squeezing farm profit margins ahead of the midterm elections. Farmers in Iowa and Kansas discuss rising harvest costs, the war in Iran and whether those pressures will change their votes. Peter Tubbs reports on the debate over farm input costs and the differing political responses across the Corn Belt.