Farms.com Home  › Ag Industry News

USDA leaders adopt an unclear stance on climate policies

Nov 29, 2024
By Farms.com

New USDA head sparks debate on climate and farming priorities

Brooke Rollins, the new USDA leader, faces significant challenges as climate change continues to heavily impact American farms.

Rollins limited agricultural policy experience, and her climate-skeptic views have left many questioning her ability to tackle pressing farm issues.

“This valuable program helps maintain the agricultural viability of the land for future generations,” said NRCS Ohio State Conservationist John Wilson.

Rollins’ support for fossil fuels and opposition to the Paris Agreement has raised concerns about her commitment to climate-smart farming practices.

The USDA has historically provided billions in funding for conservation and disaster relief. Under previous administrations, initiatives like the Inflation Reduction Act allocated $7 billion to climate-smart practices. However, ongoing delays in passing the Farm Bill have left the future of such funding uncertain. 

Farm advocacy groups worry about the increasing costs of climate change. As Ben Lilliston of the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy noted, “Climate risk is rising.

Crop insurance and disaster payouts are rising. How will she respond to the climate-related challenges facing farmers?”

The USDA’s role in supporting farmers and mitigating climate risks is critical. Rollins’ leadership will determine whether the agency strengthens climate-smart programs or shifts its focus away from sustainability. 

Farmers and policymakers are watching closely to see how Rollins shapes the future of American agriculture.


Trending Video

High Diesel Prices Pressure Farmers Ahead of Midterm Elections

Higher diesel and fertilizer prices are squeezing farm profit margins ahead of the midterm elections. Farmers in Iowa and Kansas discuss rising harvest costs, the war in Iran and whether those pressures will change their votes. Peter Tubbs reports on the debate over farm input costs and the differing political responses across the Corn Belt.