Agriculture, agri-food groups make bid for spot in Carney’s economic agenda

Jul 30, 2025

A coalition of producer and agri-business groups is calling on Prime Minister Mark Carney to make Canadian agriculture part of his economic agenda.

“Without a clear shift in approach, Canada risks falling permanently behind in a sector critical to domestic and export growth, food security, and economic resilience,” the groups said in an open letter published Monday.

The Canadian Federation of Agriculture and 29 other groups called attention to Canada’s shrinking share in the global agri-food market and slowing growth in annual productivity.

“While governments in other nations are making bold investments in agri-tech, domestic food processing, production, and export readiness, Canada has been slow to respond, losing opportunities in the process,” they said.

The coalition said Canadian agriculture and agri-food has the potential to drive an additional $100 billion in GDP growth over the next 10 years.

They asked the federal government to:

Create a focused plan for economic growth in the agricultural sector, including targets for investment in innovation, value-added processing, exports and others
Reduce regulatory burdens to make Canada more attractive to investors and innovators

Click here to see more...

Video: $400m loss to save $3.8m? The real cost of closing Canada's research farms | Agri cmte, 10 Feb 2026

Officials are forced to defend cutting a historic $3.8 million research farm while the government simultaneously funded an $8.5 million cricket factory that went bankrupt. Is this evidence of an incoherent spending strategy? Watch the full committee clash to see the government's official rationale.

A heated discussion erupts over the logic behind the government's cuts to AAFC research farms in Lacombe, Indian Head, and Quebec City. MPs question why core, decades-old scientific infrastructure is being deemed 'not core' while other, controversial programs were funded. The Deputy Minister is repeatedly pressed for the actual net savings of the decision versus the expense of relocating research programs.