Farms.com Home   News

Human Urine Could Be Used as Eco-friendly Crop Fertilizer: Study

crop

Bacterial communities in soil are as resilient to human urine as synthetic fertilizers—making recycling the bodily fluid as a fertilizer for agricultural crops a viable proposition, according to a new study.

Scientists discovered that, even when applied in high doses, one-year stored urine had little impact on  bacterial communities and produced minimal change in soil pH and salinity.

However, the researchers did discover that urine fertilization increased the relative amounts of nitrifying and denitrifying groups compared to synthetic fertilizer—implying that more  could be emitted when fertilizing with urine.

Publishing their findings in Applied Soil Ecology, the team of researchers from University of Birmingham and L'Institut Agro Montpellier, France, call for further studies on the long-term effects of urine fertilization—particularly regarding nitrogen oxide production and soil salinity.

Co-author Manon Rumeau, from the University of Birmingham, commented, "Our research highlights the potential of recycling human urine to enhance agricultural sustainability, reduce wastewater pollution, and decrease reliance on . Stored urine can be safely applied to a plant-soil system without negatively impacting the soil microbiome."

Fresh urine is composed of 95 % water with the remaining 5% made up of amino compounds, such as urea or creatinine, organic anions and inorganic salts, making it a source of bioavailable nutrients and micronutrients for plant growth.

There has been great interest in re-using human urine as a crop fertilizer, but—until the publication of this study—more understanding was required on how urine can affect soil functions and microbial communities.

Scientists fertilized a spinach crop with two different doses of a source-separated and stored —comparing these with a synthetic fertilizer treatment and a  without fertilization, conducted across four soil tanks in greenhouse conditions.

Click here to see more...

Trending Video

$400m loss to save $3.8m? The real cost of closing Canada's research farms | Agri cmte, 10 Feb 2026

Video: $400m loss to save $3.8m? The real cost of closing Canada's research farms | Agri cmte, 10 Feb 2026

Officials are forced to defend cutting a historic $3.8 million research farm while the government simultaneously funded an $8.5 million cricket factory that went bankrupt. Is this evidence of an incoherent spending strategy? Watch the full committee clash to see the government's official rationale.

A heated discussion erupts over the logic behind the government's cuts to AAFC research farms in Lacombe, Indian Head, and Quebec City. MPs question why core, decades-old scientific infrastructure is being deemed 'not core' while other, controversial programs were funded. The Deputy Minister is repeatedly pressed for the actual net savings of the decision versus the expense of relocating research programs.