Farms.com Home   News

Liberals Reject Motion To Study Effect Of Carbon Tax On Ag Industry

 
The Liberals have rejected a Conservative motion to study the effect of a carbon tax on agriculture.
 
Conservative Agriculture Critic David Anderson put forward the motion to the House of Commons Agriculture Committee this week.
 
Anderson says the refusal to examine the cost of a carbon tax to Canadian farmers and producers is unacceptable.
 
"We want to know what it's going to cost producers. We know that farmers are already paying for it when they're buying technology - the emissions cost is figured into some of the engines and machinery they're buying.
 
We know it's going to raise the cost of fuel and food for Canadian consumers. We just want to know what those costs will be," he said.
 
Anderson says they’ll continue to press the government on this matter.
 
"If the Liberals are going to move ahead with this, we want them to be transparent and accountable - neither of those things are found in what they're doing.
 
Source : Steinbachonline

Trending Video

USDA Feb Crop Report a WIN for Soybeans + 1 Year Trade Truce Extension

Video: USDA Feb Crop Report a WIN for Soybeans + 1 Year Trade Truce Extension


USDA took Trumps comments that China would buy more U.S. soybeans seriously and headline news that the U.S./China trade truce would be extended when Trump/Xi meet in the first week of April was a BIG WIN for soybeans this week! 2026 “Mini” U.S. ethanol boom thanks to 45Z + China’s ban of phosphates from Feb. – August of 2026 will not help lower fertilizer prices anytime soon! 30 mmt of Chinese corn harvest is of poor quality and maybe a technical breakout in wheat futures.

*Apologies! Where we talk about the latest CFTC update as of 10th Feb 2026, managed money funds covered their net short position in canola to the tune of +42,746 week-on-week to flip to net long 145 contracts and not (as we mistakenly said) +90,009 wk/wk to 47,408.