Farms.com Home   News

NDP repeats calls for action committee on drought relief

After nearly a decade of drought in the southwest, the Saskatchewan NDP is calling for action from the provincial government.

On Wednesday, the opposition reiterated its calls for the creation of a drought action committee.

The committee would involve affected producers and would focus on strengthening emergency measures and business risk management programs.

“(The Government of Saskatchewan) needs to sit and work with these producers and these municipalities because they know best what levers exist within those programs,” said agriculture critic Trent Wotherspoon.

“There’s a range of common-sense calls that these producers have made that would adjust and make changes to these programs to provide them the support they need.”

Wotherspoon said one of the changes would include the creation of a threshold to enable farmers to combine and retain seed from poor yields without being penalized by crop insurance going forward.

Wotherspoon and the NDP also called for a 10-year deferral on taxes for producers who have been forced to sell breeding stock because of the drought.

The Government of Saskatchewan doubled the maximum payment cap for the AgriStability business risk management program in July.

However, Wotherspoon said the province needed to go further.

Click here to see more...

Trending Video

$400m loss to save $3.8m? The real cost of closing Canada's research farms | Agri cmte, 10 Feb 2026

Video: $400m loss to save $3.8m? The real cost of closing Canada's research farms | Agri cmte, 10 Feb 2026

Officials are forced to defend cutting a historic $3.8 million research farm while the government simultaneously funded an $8.5 million cricket factory that went bankrupt. Is this evidence of an incoherent spending strategy? Watch the full committee clash to see the government's official rationale.

A heated discussion erupts over the logic behind the government's cuts to AAFC research farms in Lacombe, Indian Head, and Quebec City. MPs question why core, decades-old scientific infrastructure is being deemed 'not core' while other, controversial programs were funded. The Deputy Minister is repeatedly pressed for the actual net savings of the decision versus the expense of relocating research programs.