Farms.com Home   News

Soybean Planting-Time Management Considerations

Soybean Planting-Time Management Considerations

By Maninder Singh and Thomas Siler

Matching planting time with optimal variety maturity group and seeding rate can increase yield while minimizing input costs.

Soybean planting date has been shown to have a large impact on a crop’s yield potential. Typically, early season soybean planting has shown improved yields compared to when planting is delayed. However, it is largely unknown how other management practices should be adjusted based on planting date in Michigan. We have conducted both on-farm and small-plot research from 2018 to 2020 to better understand not only how soybean planting date impacts yield but also how other management decisions might change based on planting date.

Planting date

On-farm trials were conducted to compare early-season soybean planting dates with normal soybean planting dates in 2019 and 2020. Growers were asked to plant soybean three weeks apart in a randomized strip trial design with four replications and collect yield data from each strip. Early season planting resulted in significantly higher yields at five out of nine locations in 2019 (average yield increase of 2.6 bushels per acre, some fields had in-season pesticide application along with early planting) and at five out of 12 fields in 2020 (average yield increase of 1.2 bushels per acre) (Figure 1). None of the field reported significant yield loss from early-season planting.

Yield difference

Figure 1. Yield difference (early - late planting, separated by around three weeks) across various locations during the 2019 and 2020 growing seasons. * Denotes locations with significant yield differences. + Denotes 2019 locations with fungicide/insecticide spray at R3 stage (beginning pod) in early planting.

Small plot research trials were conducted between 2018 and 2020 using three to four planting dates ranging from late April to late June. Results from these studies show that optimal soybean planting is during or before mid-May (Figure 2). Delayed planting after mid-May resulted in a yield penalty, which increased as planting was delayed. On average, soybean yield was reduced by 0.4% per day between the mid-May and early June planting dates. Furthermore, planting after early-June resulted in an average yield reduction of 1.2% per day.

Overall, the results from these studies suggest that avoiding delayed soybean planting is critical to maximizing yield potential.

optimal planting date

Figure 2. Relationship between planting date and relative yield during the 2018, 2019 and 2020 growing seasons.

Management based on planting date

In 2018 and 2019, small plot research was conducted at Mason and Saginaw, Michigan, to determine how optimal maturity group selection, seeding rate and seed treatment decisions are impacted by soybean planting date. Results from this research showed that the benefits of early season soybean planting can be improved (with a more than 3 bushel per acre advantage) by using a variety with a later maturity group designation (Figure 3). Furthermore, when planting was delayed to late-June, using an early-maturity variety not only provided small yield advantage but also resulted in soybean seed with low moisture content at the time of harvest. Using a later maturing variety combined with an early season planting date increases the amount of growing degree day accumulation during vegetative and reproductive stages and resulted in a greater number of seeds per square foot without reducing seed weight in this study.

relationship planting date maturity date

Figure 3. Relationship between planting date (day of the year; DOY), maturity group (MG) and soybean yield.

Using a complete seed treatment (insecticide, fungicide, nematicide) did not result in improved yields in these studies, regardless of planting date. However, using the seed treatment did improve plant stands at the Mason location. The lack of yield improvement from using the seed treatment resulted in a $10.52 per acre reduction in net income compared to the non-treated control when averaged across these locations and years. It should be noted, however, that there are many conditions where a seed treatment is beneficial. Specifically, when planting into cooler, wet soils (which is more common during early-season soybean planting) a seed treatment can help prevent excessive stand loss to early-season pests such as bean leaf beetle, seed corn maggot, sudden death syndrome and seed decay and damping off.

To determine the optimal seeding rate based on soybean planting date, five seeding rates (50,000 to 210,000 seeds per acre in 40,000 increments) were planted on four planting dates ranging from late April to late June. Results show that the seeding rate that maximizes net income is lower compared to the seeding rate that maximizes yield, and optimal seeding rates are dependent on planting date (Figure 4).

seeding rate

Figure 4. Seeding rates that resulted in the optimal yield (Agronomically Optimal Seeding rate, AOSR; black bars) and optimal net returns (Economically Optimum Seeding Rate, EOSR; gray bars) during late April, mid-May, early June and late June planting dates at Mason, Michigan, and Saginaw, Michigan, during the 2018 and 2019 growing seasons.

In this study, when averaged across both locations and years, maximum yield was achieved from using a seeding rate of 124,000 seeds per acre during the late April planting date, 138,000 seeds per acre during the mid-May planting date, 151,000 seeds per acre during the early June planting date, and 218,000 seeds per acre during the late June planting date. However, maximum net income (calculated using $8.64 per bushel soybean, $65 per unit treated seed) was achieved using lower seeding rates for all planting dates.

Specifically, seeding rates of 79,000 seeds per acre during late April, 92,000 seeds per acre during mid-May, 103,000 seeds per acre during early-June, and 138,000 during late June achieved maximum net income. So, these rates were at least 45,000 seeds lower than the ones to achieve maximum yield. Even with higher current soybean prices, seeding rates that maximize income increase only by around 10,000 seeds compared to the $8.64 per bushel price point, except for late June planting. This suggests that the optimal seeding rate may be lower compared to what is currently being utilized by growers. Furthermore, increasing soybean seeding rates as planting is delayed into mid-June can help mitigate losses of yield and net returns associated with delayed planting.

Summary

In summary, the results from this research suggest that:

  • Early season soybean planting has the potential to improve yield and delayed soybean planting can reduce yield by up to 1.2% per day if planting occurs after early June.
  • Using a later maturing variety (longer maturity group designation) can further build upon the benefits of early season planting, including yield improvements.
  • Adjusting soybean seeding rates based on planting date is important to maximizing production. In general, seeding rates should be increases as soybean planting is further delayed. Also, lower seeding rates may yield less but have reduced input costs compared to higher seeding rates, and can increase maximum net income.
  • Seed treatments are most beneficial when there are pests present in the seed bed, especially during early season planting. An additional reason for planting seed treated with a base seed treatment (multiple fungicides and an insecticide) is to obtain the replant coverage offered by some seed companies.
Source : msu.edu

Trending Video

The FCDC and AgSmart Bring Plant Breeding to a Wider Audience

Video: The FCDC and AgSmart Bring Plant Breeding to a Wider Audience

In the vast prairies of Alberta, Olds College’s Field Crop Development Centre (FCDC) stands as a beacon of innovation and research in the agricultural world. The institution has become a key player in advancing agricultural technologies and practices. The FCDC’s commitment to applied research has driven them to seek effective means of disseminating their findings and creating a positive impact on the farming community.

One such avenue that aligns with their mission is AgSmart, an event dedicated to showcasing cutting-edge agricultural technologies. The coming together of the FCDC’s annual Field Day and Ag Smart has proved to be a natural fit, fostering a synergy that benefits both parties and propels the agriculture industry forward. The FCDC Field Day took part in conjunction with AgSmart for the first time this week on Aug. 1-2 in Olds, Alta. FCDC Program Director Kofi Agblor and Olds College VP of Development Todd Ormann sat down for an interview with Marc Zienkiewicz to discuss the significance of the two events taking part together and what the future holds.

The Intersection of Research and Technology The essence of the FCDC lies in its dedication to plant breeding and new seed varieties, particularly barley and triticale. While conducting research is essential, it becomes meaningful when its benefits are shared with the wider community. This is where AgSmart steps in, providing a key venue for the FCDC to showcase their research. This union between research and technology creates a holistic and enriching experience for farmers, ranchers, and industry professionals, the pair said.

Seeds as Technology For the FCDC, the partnership with AgSmart goes beyond mere event collaboration. It is about creating an environment that bridges the gap between seeds and smart technology, Ormann said. The college believes that for technology to truly revolutionize agriculture, it must begin with a strong foundation — high-quality seeds. As the saying goes, “it all starts with a seed.” To demonstrate this critical aspect, the collaboration aims to showcase the seed value chain as an integral part of the smartphone.

The Birth of a Powerful Alliance The idea of joining forces emerged when staff realized the potential synergy between AgSmart and the FCDC Field Day. With just a few days separating the two events, a proposal was put forward to merge them. The marketing and communications teams from both sides worked seamlessly to ensure the essence of both events remained intact, creating a powerful alliance that leverages the strengths of each, Agblor said.

Driving Advancements in Breeding For Agblor, the partnership with AgSmart has tremendous potential to drive advancements in breeding and other technology. With technologies like drones and imaging becoming integral to phenotyping, breeding is no longer confined to vast fields to assess thousands of plants manually. Instead, it benefits from the data-rich insights brought about by smart technologies. These advancements make breeding more efficient, precise, and instrumental in shaping the future of agriculture.

Overcoming Challenges Together While the partnership between Olds College and Ag Smart has been a resounding success, there are challenges on the horizon. Securing stable funding for long-term breeding initiatives is crucial to sustain progress. The college is committed to navigating these challenges and investing in agriculture’s future sustainably, Agblor said.