Farms.com Home   News

Water System Food Safety Inspections

Water System Food Safety Inspections
By Marissa Schuh and Phillip Tocco
 
Inspecting irrigation water systems, much like monitoring fields for wildlife intrusion, is something that often happens without much thought to recordkeeping. Crops need water, so growers are always keeping an eye on and maintaining their irrigation equipment. When approaching irrigation from a food safety perspective, be it to meet requirements of good agricultural practices (GAP) or the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) Produce Safety Rule, some key factors besides basic function need to be taken into account. This starts with thinking of the whole system, from the water source to the last emitter.
 
Why spend some time thinking about your whole system? It can help you make sure everything is in working order and it is now required under the FSMA Produce Safety Rule. For those already being audited by a third party in food safety or complying with GAP, these requirements will not be as in-depth as what growers are used to. The text of the FSMA Produce Safety Rule highlights several key components in §112.42(a):
 
112.42(a) At the beginning of a growing season, as appropriate, but at least once annually, you must inspect all of your agricultural water systems, to the extent they are under your control (including water sources, water distribution systems, facilities, and equipment), to identify conditions that are reasonably likely to introduce known or reasonably foreseeable hazards into or onto covered produce or food contact surfaces in light of your covered produce, practices, and conditions, including consideration of the following:
 
(1) The nature of each agricultural water source (for example, ground water or surface water);
 
(2) The extent of your control over each agricultural water source;
 
(3) The degree of protection of each agricultural water source;
 
(4) Use of adjacent and nearby land; and
 
(5) The likelihood of introduction of known or reasonably foreseeable hazards to agricultural water by another user of agricultural water before the water reaches your covered farm.
 
The considerations required under the FSMA Produce Safety Rule are qualitative in nature (i.e., is a water source very controlled by you, somewhat controlled by you or poorly controlled by you?) It requires the grower to make judgements to define the water sources. The other thing that a grower will see after following the criteria in §112.42(a) for a few years is the results likely will change very little if the water meets the water quality profile. These items serve to double-check everything that used to be true about the water system when the inspection was last conducted. It confirms that these things continue to be true.
 
To cover the last part of this requirement, an annual water system inspection can be conducted. Many parts of this inspection are likely wrapped up in the farm’s day-to-day activities, and all you will need to do to comply is formalize things with a record. For example, your water system inspection will start by guaranteeing the integrity of the delivery system. These are usually obvious from pressure sensor monitoring. If pressure sensors show an unexpected pressure drop in the system, a grower’s natural response is to go looking for the leak. Regular checks to ensure the function of the pressure sensors may help avoid going on wild goose chases looking for leaks that don’t exist.
 
Apart from checking if pressure sensors are in working order, it is important to ensure check valves are functioning properly. This is only possible in those instances where a check valve is accessible. If the system you use does not have an accessible check valve, one should be installed when making equipment upgrades.
 
Another area of concern is the water intake area for surface water. In general, it must be kept “free of debris, trash, domesticated animals, and other possible sources of contamination of covered produce to the extent practicable and appropriate under the circumstances,” according to §112.42(c) Checking for trash around the intake or any things the intake may have sucked to itself is essential to both meeting GAP requirements and the FSMA Produce Safety Rule.
 
If one of the sources of water is a well, it should be inspected as part of this annual inspection too. Look to ensure the wellhead is locked and the conduit pipe for the electrical is present and secure enough to prevent access of insects and other animals to the well. The same goes for the vent hole. It should be screened to prevent access. If a concrete pad exists, ensure that it isn’t cracked, as this may be a sign that liquid is infiltrating the bentonite seal below it and swelling, placing pressure on the concrete.
 

Trending Video

The FCDC and AgSmart Bring Plant Breeding to a Wider Audience

Video: The FCDC and AgSmart Bring Plant Breeding to a Wider Audience

In the vast prairies of Alberta, Olds College’s Field Crop Development Centre (FCDC) stands as a beacon of innovation and research in the agricultural world. The institution has become a key player in advancing agricultural technologies and practices. The FCDC’s commitment to applied research has driven them to seek effective means of disseminating their findings and creating a positive impact on the farming community.

One such avenue that aligns with their mission is AgSmart, an event dedicated to showcasing cutting-edge agricultural technologies. The coming together of the FCDC’s annual Field Day and Ag Smart has proved to be a natural fit, fostering a synergy that benefits both parties and propels the agriculture industry forward. The FCDC Field Day took part in conjunction with AgSmart for the first time this week on Aug. 1-2 in Olds, Alta. FCDC Program Director Kofi Agblor and Olds College VP of Development Todd Ormann sat down for an interview with Marc Zienkiewicz to discuss the significance of the two events taking part together and what the future holds.

The Intersection of Research and Technology The essence of the FCDC lies in its dedication to plant breeding and new seed varieties, particularly barley and triticale. While conducting research is essential, it becomes meaningful when its benefits are shared with the wider community. This is where AgSmart steps in, providing a key venue for the FCDC to showcase their research. This union between research and technology creates a holistic and enriching experience for farmers, ranchers, and industry professionals, the pair said.

Seeds as Technology For the FCDC, the partnership with AgSmart goes beyond mere event collaboration. It is about creating an environment that bridges the gap between seeds and smart technology, Ormann said. The college believes that for technology to truly revolutionize agriculture, it must begin with a strong foundation — high-quality seeds. As the saying goes, “it all starts with a seed.” To demonstrate this critical aspect, the collaboration aims to showcase the seed value chain as an integral part of the smartphone.

The Birth of a Powerful Alliance The idea of joining forces emerged when staff realized the potential synergy between AgSmart and the FCDC Field Day. With just a few days separating the two events, a proposal was put forward to merge them. The marketing and communications teams from both sides worked seamlessly to ensure the essence of both events remained intact, creating a powerful alliance that leverages the strengths of each, Agblor said.

Driving Advancements in Breeding For Agblor, the partnership with AgSmart has tremendous potential to drive advancements in breeding and other technology. With technologies like drones and imaging becoming integral to phenotyping, breeding is no longer confined to vast fields to assess thousands of plants manually. Instead, it benefits from the data-rich insights brought about by smart technologies. These advancements make breeding more efficient, precise, and instrumental in shaping the future of agriculture.

Overcoming Challenges Together While the partnership between Olds College and Ag Smart has been a resounding success, there are challenges on the horizon. Securing stable funding for long-term breeding initiatives is crucial to sustain progress. The college is committed to navigating these challenges and investing in agriculture’s future sustainably, Agblor said.