‘We need to ship our product:’ Sask producers want rail dispute settled

Sep 04, 2024

The Agricultural Producers Association Of Saskatchewan (APAS) are hoping for a quick resolution to the labour dispute between rail workers and CN Rail and Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CPKC).

The workers are represented by the Teamsters union, which recently appealed the federal labour board’s decision to impose binding arbitration that ended the strike by CPKC workers and the lockout by CN Rail.

APAS President Ian Boxall said it needs to be understood how important rail service is for Saskatchewan producers.

“We’re in the middle of the country, equal distance from either port. We need the railroads to send our products out to port so that it can be shipped around the world to the people that require it,” Boxall told 980 CJME on Friday.

“The rail is critical to producers, it’s critical to Canada. We are an exporting nation, we produce a lot of products here that are looked to around the world and we need to ensure we deliver those products in a timely fashion to the end users.”

With the importance of rail to the Canadian economy, Boxall said he fears that Canada’s trading partners will look to alternatives if the country is seen as unreliable in its ability to deliver goods on time.

Boxall said he doesn’t have an opinion on whether or not the workers should be able to strike — only that he wanted to see the union and the rail companies at the table and coming up with a result that works for both.

Boxall said farmers are concerned as they head into harvest season.

“We need to ship our product, we need to be able to deliver our product and get paid,” Boxall said.

“If country elevators are full because they can’t ship out on the rail, then we can’t deliver and hence we can’t get paid. So, this will be a huge cash flow issue for producers.”

Boxall said railroads are operating at a maximum capacity already, so if any more time is lost in the fall, it can’t be made up, leaving farmers behind for the rest of the growing year.

Boxall also said trucking isn’t a feasible or cost-effective option for farmers to move product.

Click here to see more...

Video: How to fix a leaking pond.

Does the pond leak? Ummmm....possibly a tiny bit. Well, more than a bit...ok, the darn thing leaks like a sieve!

QUESTIONS ANSWERED: Damit is not plastic. Therefore, there are no microplastics. I wish I had not mentioned plastic, but that is a very common polymer and I mentioned it as an example of a polymer. A polymer is simply a chain of repeating molecules, or "monomers." Cellulose is a polymer of glucose molecules. Starches are also polymers of various molecules such as fructose, maltose, etc. We have many polymers inside our bodies. In other words, just knowing something is a polymer doesn't make it bad, toxic, harmful, etc. However, this also doesn't mean all polymers are safe.

The specific polymer used for Damit is a trade secret, however, it has been closely scrutinized by multiple health and safety authorities. This includes the governmental authorities of Australia, the USA, Europe, and Asia. Not only have they determined that is safe to use in earthen ponds, and not harmful to fish, but it is considered safe to use in human potable water systems in all of these areas. And of course, they know the exact makeup of the polymer when making this determination. I'm told that the same polymer is in use by many municipalities to keep potable water storage tanks leak free. I can't tell you exactly what the polymer is, because I don't know, but given the confidence with which the governmental authorities have authorized its use, I would bet it is made of a monomer that we are exposed to all the time, like fructose or something.

It also breaks down in a matter of years, and does not accumulate in the environment. The end products of breaking down are CO2, water, and base minerals like potassium. The SDS reports no need for concern with ingestion, inhalation, or contact. If in eyes, rinse with water.

End result, can I say for sure that it is 100% safe? No, I don't know exactly what it is. But given people who do know exactly what it is, and have scrutinized it, have approved it for use in human potable water systems, I'm pretty comfortable putting it in an earthen pond.