The Western Canadian Wheat Growers Association is urging Senators and policymakers to reconsider the long-term consequences of Bill C-202, which seeks to restrict the inclusion of supply-managed sectors in future trade negotiations. While we respect the intent to shield certain Canadian producers, this approach risks undermining broader agricultural competitiveness and weakening Canada’s standing in global markets.
A Need for Balanced Policy, Not Trade Barriers
Canada’s agricultural strength lies in its diversity and global reach. Wheat producers export roughly 90 percent of their crop, and our success depends on trade agreements that open markets and maintain Canada’s reputation as a reliable supplier. Restricting flexibility in trade negotiations, as Bill C-202 proposes, could hamstring Canada’s ability to secure new opportunities, respond to shifting global dynamics, and compete effectively.
Unfortunately, we’ve already seen the consequences of short-sighted, protectionist thinking. The recent imposition of retaliatory tariffs on electric vehicles, meant to make a political point, instead put Canadian exporters at risk with no clear benefit in return. There was no scenario planning, no strategic foresight, and no serious consideration for how this move might invite retaliation against Canadian canola, pork, peas, and other key exports. For a trade-dependent nation like ours, this is a dangerous path.
Protecting One Sector Shouldn’t Mean Sacrificing Others
We understand the desire to support domestic sectors. But it is one thing to ensure producers are competitive and viable. It is another to ask Canadian families to pay some of the highest prices in the world for milk, cheese, eggs, and poultry, while at the same time restricting trade and stalling progress for the rest of the agricultural sector.
Click here to see more...