Farms.com Home   News

Should Soybean be Planted before Corn? MU Research Still Favors Corn

By Linda Geist
soybean first and delay corn planting
In recent years, the agriculture community began discussing whether it makes sense to plant soybean first and delay corn planting.
 
The University of Missouri Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute predicts a 7% increase in soybean acres planted in 2021. That leaves farmers wondering whether they could, or should, plant soybean before corn.
 
Multiyear research at MU’s Bradford Research Center near Columbia still favors corn over soybean for first planting in midwestern corn-soybean rotations, says MU Extension soybean specialist Bill Wiebold.
 
The research shows the importance of considering the entire crop operation over individual crops or any one component, he says. “If early soybean planting delays corn planting, the productivity of the enterprise could be harmed. Under most circumstances, it makes sense to plant corn before soybean.”
 
Prior research conducted elsewhere favored early soybean planting but did not examine yields from both crops or look at the effects of delayed corn planting. MU data for both soybean and corn come from the same location, often in the same year. “This allowed us to observe the effects of planting dates on performance of the entire rotation, not just a single component,” Wiebold says.
 
Researchers looked at data from 12 MU soybean experiments using three and often five planting dates, with the first in late March. Data also give a picture of how weather influenced grain crop yields.
 
Wiebold planted up to five varieties of high-yield, commercially available soybean with maturity ratings of mid-MG3 to mid-MG4 at a rate of 160,000 seeds per acre.
 
The corn yield data covers six years with five planting dates beginning in the last week of March. The number of hybrids varied from four to six, with relative corn maturity (RCM) varying from 106 to 114 using a seeding rate of 30,000 kernels per acre.
 
Soybean and corn were planted into crop residue in a typical rotation with 30-inch rows.
 
Corn yields more bushels per acre than soybean, so researchers compared relative yields to yield responses. Researchers averaged yields for each crop across all experiments.
 
Yields of both crops decline when planting is delayed. However, corn starts losing yield at least a month earlier than soybean, and corn yields drop quicker than soybean with delayed planting.
 
For example, 30 days after yields began to decrease, corn went down 13% and soybean dropped about 8%. The rate of yield loss increased so that 10 days later yields dropped 20% for corn and 14% for soybean.
 
Soybean yield data from the experiments came from March plantings and give a good comparison of the date when yields start to decrease. Corn yields start to decrease when planting begins after April 20. Soybean yields remain unaffected by planting dates in April and only decreased 4% by May 20.
 
The two crops also respond differently to planting dates in other ways.
 
Soybean traits make it make it more stable than corn in its response to weather. Soybean also has more opportunity to produce. Wiebold explains that soybean plants flower for 30 or more days while corn plants complete pollen shed in less than 10 days.
 
Soybean produces yield at nearly every node on the plant, while corn yield is on a single ear. Soybean also produces three to four times as many flowers than are accounted for as pods at harvest, so there is abundant yield backup.
Source : missouri.edu

Trending Video

Wheat Yields in USA and China Threatened by Heat Waves Breaking Enzymes

Video: Wheat Yields in USA and China Threatened by Heat Waves Breaking Enzymes

A new peer reviewed study looks at the generally unrecognized risk of heat waves surpassing the threshold for enzyme damage in wheat.

Most studies that look at crop failure in the main food growing regions (breadbaskets of the planet) look at temperatures and droughts in the historical records to assess present day risk. Since the climate system has changed, these historical based risk analysis studies underestimate the present-day risks.

What this new research study does is generate an ensemble of plausible scenarios for the present climate in terms of temperatures and precipitation, and looks at how many of these plausible scenarios exceed the enzyme-breaking temperature of 32.8 C for wheat, and exceed the high stress yield reducing temperature of 27.8 C for wheat. Also, the study considers the possibility of a compounded failure with heat waves in both regions simultaneously, this greatly reducing global wheat supply and causing severe shortages.

Results show that the likelihood (risk) of wheat crop failure with a one-in-hundred likelihood in 1981 has in today’s climate become increased by 16x in the USA winter wheat crop (to one-in-six) and by 6x in northeast China (to one-in-sixteen).

The risks determined in this new paper are much greater than that obtained in previous work that determines risk by analyzing historical climate patterns.

Clearly, since the climate system is rapidly changing, we cannot assume stationarity and calculate risk probabilities like we did traditionally before.

We are essentially on a new planet, with a new climate regime, and have to understand that everything is different now.