Farms.com Home   News

Spring Forage Fertilization Considerations

By Brian Lang and Rebecca Vittetoe
 
Fertilization is just as important for forages as it is for row crops to maximize productivity. This article addresses spring fertilization considerations for forage crops and pastures.
 
Nitrogen considerations
 
Nitrogen (N) applications can either be a one-time, annual application or can be split applied. Suggested N application rates for single application are in Table 1 and rates for split applications are in Table 2.
 
Table 1. Suggested N application rates for a single annual application

Kentucky bluegrass

April: 60-100 lbs N/acre

Tall cool-season grasses

April: 80-120 lbs N/acre

Warm-season grasses

Late April to early May: 80-150 lbs N/acre

Table 2. Suggested N application rates for split applications

Kentucky bluegrass

  • Early spring (March-April) 60-80 lbs N/acre
  • Late spring (May-early June) additional 30-40 lbs N/acre (optional)
  • And/or late summer (August-September) additional 30-40 lbs N/acre

Tall cool-season grasses

(orchardgrass, smooth bromegrass, reed canarygrass, and tall fescue*)

  • Early spring (March-April): 80-120 lbs N/acre
  • Late spring (May-early June) additional 40-60 lbs N/acre (optional)
  • And/or late summer (August-September) additional 40-60 lbs N/acre
* Note: For pastures or hayfields with tall fescue, high N rates increase the risk of fescue toxicosis.
 
For legume-grass mixed pastures or hayfields, if the stand is less than 1/3 legume, treat as a grass pasture or hayfield. If the stand is more than 1/3 legume, no nitrogen is recommended. Also note that for legume-grass mixed pastures or hayfields, high or frequent applications of N (particularly spring N applications) will make the grass component more competitive and limit the amount of legumes in the mixture. To encourage a greater legume presence, use modest N rates and limit application to summer or fall. 
 
Phosphorus, potassium, and lime considerations
 
Forage plants also respond to added phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) when soils have low or very low P and K test levels. Taking a soil test is the only way to know what those levels are and to determine how much P and K is needed.
 
While pastures typically have little nutrient removal, that doesn’t mean that the redistribution of those nutrients is equal. Nutrient levels tend to be higher near shade and watering sites. Additionally, how grazing is managed (continuously, rotational, strip, etc.) can impact nutrient redistribution. Taking these factors into account when soil sampling pastures is important.  
 
For hayfields or pastures that have hay removed, it is important to put on additional P and K fertilizer based on crop nutrient removal. For instance, each ton of smooth bromegrass hay harvested at 15% moisture removes 7.9 pounds of phosphate (P2O5) and 41 pounds of potash (K2O) per acre. More information on crop nutrient removal for other forage crops can be found in Table 3 of PM1688, A General Guide for Crop Nutrient and Limestone Recommendations in Iowa.
 
Timing of P and K applications can be flexible; however, it may be more convenient to fertilize in the fall or spring along with the N fertilizer application.  
 
Soil pH can also impact forage productivity. It is recommended for grass-based hayfields and pastures to maintain a soil pH of around 6.0. To encourage and maintain legumes, try to maintain a pH of 6.5 for clovers and birdsfoot trefoil and a pH of 6.9 for alfalfa. 
Source : iastate.edu

Trending Video

Seeing the Whole Season: How Continuous Crop Modeling Is Changing Breeding

Video: Seeing the Whole Season: How Continuous Crop Modeling Is Changing Breeding

Plant breeding has long been shaped by snapshots. A walk through a plot. A single set of notes. A yield check at the end of the season. But crops do not grow in moments. They change every day.

In this conversation, Gary Nijak of AerialPLOT explains how continuous crop modeling is changing the way breeders see, measure, and select plants by capturing growth, stress, and recovery across the entire season, not just at isolated points in time.

Nijak breaks down why point-in-time observations can miss critical performance signals, how repeated, season-long data collection removes the human bottleneck in breeding, and what becomes possible when every plot is treated as a living data set. He also explores how continuous modeling allows breeding programs to move beyond vague descriptors and toward measurable, repeatable insights that connect directly to on-farm outcomes.

This conversation explores:

• What continuous crop modeling is and how it works

• Why traditional field observations fall short over a full growing season

• How scale and repeated measurement change breeding decisions

• What “digital twins” of plots mean for selection and performance

• Why data, not hardware, is driving the next shift in breeding innovation As data-driven breeding moves from research into real-world programs, this discussion offers a clear look at how seeing the whole season is reshaping value for breeders, seed companies, and farmers, and why this may be only the beginning.