Farms.com Home   News

Stable Flies on Pastured Cattle

By Dave Boxler

Pastured animals that exhibit defensive behaviors such as tail flicking, skin twitching, leg stamping, lying with their legs tucked underneath, standing in water, and bunching in corners of pastures, are likely being attacked by the stable fly. Animals bunching to fight stable flies can damage forage, and on fragile soils, may create blow outs. Historically, stable flies had only been pests of cattle in dairies and feedlots.

Since the 1980’s, stable flies have emerged to be a serious pest of pastured cattle. This coincided with livestock producers transitioning away from small hay bales to large round bales in stationary feeders. Research studies indicated this transition increased stable fly numbers found in pastures because leftover piles of hay mixed with animal urine and manure create an ideal environment for stable fly larval development. However, other larval developing sites may also contribute to pasture populations.   

Both sexes of the stable fly require a blood meal, usually twice a day depending upon the weather. They prefer to feed on the legs and the belly area of pastured animals (Figure 1).

 After feeding the stable fly will seek a shaded resting site to digest the bloodmeal. In pasture windbreaks (coniferous or deciduous), walls of structures, windmill towers, and water tanks (Fig 2) serve as possible resting sites.

While the impact of stable flies on the performance of dairy and confined cattle has been well documented, the stable fly impact on pastured cattle has been less examined. A pasture study conducted at the University of Nebraska in the late 1990s saw a reduced average daily gain of 0.44 lb. in three, 84-day trials with cattle receiving no insecticide treatment versus cattle that received a treatment.  An economic injury level (EIL) of five flies per leg has been suggested and is often exceeded in normal pasture conditions. The EIL may be less based on the results of the above study, where stable fly numbers averaged 3.6 flies per leg.

Source : unl.edu

Trending Video

Swine Industry Advances: Biodigesters Lower Emissions and Increase Profits

Video: Swine Industry Advances: Biodigesters Lower Emissions and Increase Profits

Analysis of greenhouse gas (GHG emissions) in the Canadian swine sector found that CH4 emissions from manure were the largest contributor to the overall emissions, followed by emissions from energy use and crop production.

This innovative project, "Improving Swine Manure-Digestate Management Practices Towards Carbon Neutrality With Net Zero Emission Concepts," from Dr. Rajinikanth Rajagopal, under Swine Cluster 4, seeks to develop strategies to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions.

While the management of manure can be very demanding and expensive for swine operations, it can also be viewed as an opportunity for GHG mitigation, as manure storage is an emission source built and managed by swine producers. Moreover, the majority of CH4 emissions from manure occur during a short period of time in the summer, which can potentially be mitigated with targeted intervention.

In tandem with understanding baseline emissions, Dr. Rajagopal's work focuses on evaluating emission mitigation options. Manure additives have the potential of reducing manure methane emissions. Additives can be deployed relatively quickly, enabling near-term emission reductions while biodigesters are being built. Furthermore, additives can be a long-term solution at farms where biogas is not feasible (e.g., when it’s too far from a central digester). Similarly, after biodigestion, additives can also be used to further reduce emissions from storage to minimize the carbon intensity of the bioenergy.