Farms.com Home  › News

Optimal Redistribution of Nitrogen Fertilizer Among Countries

REDISTRIBUTED NITROGEN INPUT. DIFFERENCES RELATIVE TO CURRENT DISTRIBUTION BY (A) MAXIMIZED PRODUCTION OF MAIZE, RICE, AND WHEAT WITH CURRENT GLOBAL NITROGEN INPUT (190 TG/A) AND (B) WITH THE INPUT REDUCED TO WITHIN THE PROPOSED PLANETARY BOUNDARY OF 62 TG/A, (C) WITH MINIMIZED INPUT FOR CURRENT GLOBAL PRODUCTION AND (D) MAXIMIZED PRODUCTION WITH THE INPUT REDUCED TO WITHIN THE UPPER BOUNDARY OF THE UNCERTAINTY ZONE OF THE PROPOSED PLANETARY BOUNDARY (82 TG/A).

Shifting some use of nitrogen from rich countries to poor countries would improve food security and environmental sustainability, according to a study. Wealthy countries tend to use too much nitrogen fertilizer, which leads to climate change, water pollution, and biodiversity degradation.

Poor countries lack sufficient nitrogen to attain proper crop yields. Helena Kahiluoto and colleagues quantified the optimal redistribution of nitrogen input for production of maize, rice, and wheat among countries and sub-national regions, using a set of nitrogen-yield response functions from an ensemble of empirically evaluated global gridded crop models.

The authors modeled production for both the current level of nitrogen use and for lower levels deemed sustainable. In addition, the authors modeled the lowest possible use of nitrogen to achieve today’s level of food production. Optimal redistribution of today’s level of nitrogen use would increase global crop production by 12%.

In this scenario, countries with moderate or severe food insecurity in more than half of the population would see eightfold increases in nitrogen use and 108–110% increases in food production. In eastern Asia, maximization of global production would reduce nitrogen input by half while production would decline only by 6%, with most of this decline occurring in China.

The authors found that current levels of global maize, rice, and wheat production could be maintained with just 53–68% of the current nitrogen used, if the nutrient were redistributed.

Click here to see more...

Trending Video

From Students to Solutions | On The Brink: Season 2, Episode 14

Video: From Students to Solutions | On The Brink: Season 2, Episode 14

Ask Canada’s most decorated soybean breeder his favourite part of the job and he doesn’t name a single variety. He names the students.

Istvan Rajcan is a professor of soybean breeding and genetics in the Department of Plant Agriculture at the University of Guelph, where he has run the soybean breeding program for 28 and a half years. In that time he has developed 87 soybean cultivars, published 140 refereed papers and trained 51 graduate students. In 2025 he received the Public Sector Impact Award from the National Association for Plant Breeding.

He is also worried. In this episode he says Canada is at a crossroads, pointing to recent government cuts to plant breeding programs and to the facilities that support them. His prescription is structural. "Plant breeding funding formula has to be a long-term one," he says.

The formula he is defending is the public-private matching arrangement his program runs on. Private seed companies fund the work, provincial or federal money matches it, and the combined pool stretches each dollar further than either source could alone. At the National Association for Plant Breeding annual meeting in June, he says American public breeders were often surprised at how well that collaboration works in Canada.

He also describes how the people entering plant breeding have changed. His early graduate students came mostly from farms. More recently they include, in his words, "city kids who just became excited about genetics."

Topics covered:

Why public-private plant breeding funding in Canada needs a long-term

commitment rather than a larger one

How matching private seed company investment with provincial and federal

dollars multiplies research capacity

How the graduate student pipeline into plant breeding has shifted from

farm kids to city kids