Farms.com Home   News

Carbon Pricing Could Take Money From Manitoba Farmers, Industry Group Says

 
Manitoba's agricultural industry is one of the province's big emitters, and talk of a price on carbon emissions has producers worried it could take money right out of their pocketbooks.
 
"We have a choice right now," said Dan Mazier, president of Keystone Agricultural Producers (KAP). "The choice would be a scheme that would allow farmers to be part of the solution or be part of the problem."
 
The federal government has given the provinces a deadline of 2018 to come up with a carbon pricing scheme. Two options on the table are a cap-and-trade system and a price-per-tonne on carbon.
 
Premier Brian Pallister has already ruled out a cap-and-trade system, but has not yet made a decision on a carbon tax. But some say that would fall heavily on the shoulders of smaller players, like individual producers.
 
Gaile Whelan Enns, the director of Manitoba Wildlands and a board member of Climate Action Network Canada, says the other big emission creators in this province are transportation and the heating of large buildings.
 
"Conventional cap-and-trade in Manitoba would really only deal with large emitters," said  Whelan Enns. "That's only about 10 per cent of our emmissions."
 
That leaves a price-per-tonne system, or a carbon tax.
 
Details of how far-reaching a carbon tax system would be are still unknown, but Maizer says it'll place farmers in a precarious situation. It could potentially force farmers to shell out more for fuels and fertilizers, without seeing a return in the market for their crops. 
 
On the other hand, it might encourage the agricultural industry, along with others, to change.
 
"If one argues that this is a tax, and certainly that concern is there, but putting a price on something in the whole economy where it's equal impact isn't an unequal tax," Whelan Enns said. "It does in fact put great incentive to change business practices, change industrial practices."
 
A challenge for everyone
 
According to Mazier, if products, like fuel for machinery and fertilizers for crops, are included in carbon pricing, that added cost could be passed down to producers. But farmers can't pass that price on to the marketplace when the crop is delivered to the elevator, leaving the farmer to absorb the cost on razor-thin margins and high input costs.
 
He said members of KAP have been discussing the potential implications and possible solutions to pitch to the government, but there are still more questions than answers, such as will producers get credits for the carbon their crops collect?
 
Source : CBC

Trending Video

U.S.-China Trade “Truce” + U.S. Fed Cuts Rates Again

Video: U.S.-China Trade “Truce” + U.S. Fed Cuts Rates Again


The market was hoping for a US-China trade deal, but we got a trade “truce” for now from the keenly awaited Trump-Xi meeting at the APEC Summit.
China commits to minimum purchase commitments of 12 MMT of U.S. soybeans during the “current season” and a minimum of 25 MMT annually through 2028.
U.S. Treasury Sec Bessent said other Asian countries have agreed to buy additional 19 MMT of US soybean.
Soybean futures trading above $11 now- they normally tend to rally to $12.
As expected, US Fed cuts interest rates by -0.25% again in October to 3.75%–4.00%. No further cuts promised for this year but trade looking out to the Dec FOMC.
The Bank of Canada cut interest rates to 2.25% but raised concern over trade war damage.
Soy meal futures, remarkably, have had 14 consecutive higher close sessions. A bull market in soybeans is a bull market in soy meal!
Cattle futures lower as funds unwind out of cattle for now due to Trump headlines and objective to lower beef prices.
All major stock indices climb to new record highs. It was Mag 7 reporting week, which had mixed results. But we now have the first $5 trillion company in Nvidia!