Farms.com Home   News

Carbon Pricing Could Take Money From Manitoba Farmers, Industry Group Says

 
Manitoba's agricultural industry is one of the province's big emitters, and talk of a price on carbon emissions has producers worried it could take money right out of their pocketbooks.
 
"We have a choice right now," said Dan Mazier, president of Keystone Agricultural Producers (KAP). "The choice would be a scheme that would allow farmers to be part of the solution or be part of the problem."
 
The federal government has given the provinces a deadline of 2018 to come up with a carbon pricing scheme. Two options on the table are a cap-and-trade system and a price-per-tonne on carbon.
 
Premier Brian Pallister has already ruled out a cap-and-trade system, but has not yet made a decision on a carbon tax. But some say that would fall heavily on the shoulders of smaller players, like individual producers.
 
Gaile Whelan Enns, the director of Manitoba Wildlands and a board member of Climate Action Network Canada, says the other big emission creators in this province are transportation and the heating of large buildings.
 
"Conventional cap-and-trade in Manitoba would really only deal with large emitters," said  Whelan Enns. "That's only about 10 per cent of our emmissions."
 
That leaves a price-per-tonne system, or a carbon tax.
 
Details of how far-reaching a carbon tax system would be are still unknown, but Maizer says it'll place farmers in a precarious situation. It could potentially force farmers to shell out more for fuels and fertilizers, without seeing a return in the market for their crops. 
 
On the other hand, it might encourage the agricultural industry, along with others, to change.
 
"If one argues that this is a tax, and certainly that concern is there, but putting a price on something in the whole economy where it's equal impact isn't an unequal tax," Whelan Enns said. "It does in fact put great incentive to change business practices, change industrial practices."
 
A challenge for everyone
 
According to Mazier, if products, like fuel for machinery and fertilizers for crops, are included in carbon pricing, that added cost could be passed down to producers. But farmers can't pass that price on to the marketplace when the crop is delivered to the elevator, leaving the farmer to absorb the cost on razor-thin margins and high input costs.
 
He said members of KAP have been discussing the potential implications and possible solutions to pitch to the government, but there are still more questions than answers, such as will producers get credits for the carbon their crops collect?
 
Source : CBC

Trending Video

Evolution of Beef Cattle Farming

Video: Evolution of Beef Cattle Farming

The Clear Conversations podcast took to the road for a special episode recorded in Nashville during CattleCon, bringing listeners straight into the heart of the cattle industry. Host Tracy Sellers welcomed rancher Steve Wooten of Beatty Canyon Ranch in Colorado for a wide-ranging discussion that blended family history and sustainability, particularly as it relates to the future of beef production.

Sustainability emerged as a central theme of the conversation, a word that Wooten acknowledges can mean very different things depending on who you ask. For him, sustainability starts with the soil. Healthy soil produces healthy grass, which supports efficient cattle capable of producing year after year with minimal external inputs. It’s an approach that equally considers vegetation, animal efficiency, and long-term profitability.

That philosophy aligned naturally with Wooten’s involvement in the U.S. Roundtable for Sustainable Beef, where he served as a representative for the Colorado Cattlemen’s Association. The roundtable brings together the entire beef supply chain—from producers to retailers—along with universities, NGOs, and allied industries. Its goal is not regulation, Wooten emphasized, but collaboration, shared learning, and continuous improvement.