Farms.com Home   News

Carbon Pricing Could Take Money From Manitoba Farmers, Industry Group Says

 
Manitoba's agricultural industry is one of the province's big emitters, and talk of a price on carbon emissions has producers worried it could take money right out of their pocketbooks.
 
"We have a choice right now," said Dan Mazier, president of Keystone Agricultural Producers (KAP). "The choice would be a scheme that would allow farmers to be part of the solution or be part of the problem."
 
The federal government has given the provinces a deadline of 2018 to come up with a carbon pricing scheme. Two options on the table are a cap-and-trade system and a price-per-tonne on carbon.
 
Premier Brian Pallister has already ruled out a cap-and-trade system, but has not yet made a decision on a carbon tax. But some say that would fall heavily on the shoulders of smaller players, like individual producers.
 
Gaile Whelan Enns, the director of Manitoba Wildlands and a board member of Climate Action Network Canada, says the other big emission creators in this province are transportation and the heating of large buildings.
 
"Conventional cap-and-trade in Manitoba would really only deal with large emitters," said  Whelan Enns. "That's only about 10 per cent of our emmissions."
 
That leaves a price-per-tonne system, or a carbon tax.
 
Details of how far-reaching a carbon tax system would be are still unknown, but Maizer says it'll place farmers in a precarious situation. It could potentially force farmers to shell out more for fuels and fertilizers, without seeing a return in the market for their crops. 
 
On the other hand, it might encourage the agricultural industry, along with others, to change.
 
"If one argues that this is a tax, and certainly that concern is there, but putting a price on something in the whole economy where it's equal impact isn't an unequal tax," Whelan Enns said. "It does in fact put great incentive to change business practices, change industrial practices."
 
A challenge for everyone
 
According to Mazier, if products, like fuel for machinery and fertilizers for crops, are included in carbon pricing, that added cost could be passed down to producers. But farmers can't pass that price on to the marketplace when the crop is delivered to the elevator, leaving the farmer to absorb the cost on razor-thin margins and high input costs.
 
He said members of KAP have been discussing the potential implications and possible solutions to pitch to the government, but there are still more questions than answers, such as will producers get credits for the carbon their crops collect?
 
Source : CBC

Trending Video

Did Bears Win Thanksgiving, Will Bulls Get Christmas?

Video: Did Bears Win Thanksgiving, Will Bulls Get Christmas?


Did the bears win Thanksgiving (although this week had green on the screen), and will the bulls get Christmas? Bears won thanksgiving thanks to a USDA Nov crop report dud that stalled the bullish grain momentum for a brief period. But a bullish lower yield surprise in the Dec crop report could reignite the rally.
2026 U.S. winter wheat planting is nearly complete at 97% while crop conditions improved by 3 points to 48% good-to-excellent. US corn & soybean harvest is complete.
High corn demand, which is off the chart, and more Chinese soybean demand could support a Christmas rally.
Nasdaq had it’s worst November since 2011.
A U.S. Fed rate cut in December will help fund flow and sentiment.
Bitcoin held a long-term support at 80,000 and that's positive for fund flow and sentiment. It should help stock prices and Ag as we go into December.
Fertilizer prices continue to climb as we look ahead to 2026. Farmers may rely more on the nutrients that they already have in their soils.
South American Weather remains critical as the soybean reproductive stage starts from late Nov to late Feb depending on planting date.
Will a Russia-Ukraine peace deal happen by year-end?
CFTC data as of showed more managed money fund sell-off as of October 14th.