Farms.com Home   News

Poll Shows 82% of People Support Incentives to Farmers for Soil Health

Poll Shows 82% of People Support Incentives to Farmers for Soil Health

By Lara Bryant and Matthew Kaplan

According to a new study from the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication, two-thirds of Americans worry about the effects of climate change, and a similar percentage say climate change already is affecting our weather. But when asked what should be done about global warming, Americans are more sharply divided. That is, except on one point: 82% -- including majorities across the political spectrum -- endorse federal funding to help farmers improve practices to protect and restore the soil so it absorbs and stores more carbon. In fact, planting cover crops and similar measures were the most popular among the 20 global warming solutions that Yale researchers polled more than 1,000 Americans on earlier this year. 

Congress must listen. Coming on top of recent polling by National Wildlife Federation showing that 78% of farmers supportthe concept of a cover crop incentive, the Yale poll is the clearest evidence yet that large majorities of Americans want the farm bill to include an incentive for farmers to plant crops in the off season to prevent erosion and enrich soil quality. 

Click here to see more...

Trending Video

$400m loss to save $3.8m? The real cost of closing Canada's research farms | Agri cmte, 10 Feb 2026

Video: $400m loss to save $3.8m? The real cost of closing Canada's research farms | Agri cmte, 10 Feb 2026

Officials are forced to defend cutting a historic $3.8 million research farm while the government simultaneously funded an $8.5 million cricket factory that went bankrupt. Is this evidence of an incoherent spending strategy? Watch the full committee clash to see the government's official rationale.

A heated discussion erupts over the logic behind the government's cuts to AAFC research farms in Lacombe, Indian Head, and Quebec City. MPs question why core, decades-old scientific infrastructure is being deemed 'not core' while other, controversial programs were funded. The Deputy Minister is repeatedly pressed for the actual net savings of the decision versus the expense of relocating research programs.