Farms.com Home   News

Manure Provides Plant Nutrients, But Not Aalways At Book Value

By Jim Isleib

With the current economic challenges faced by Michigan farmers, taking full advantage of the plant nutrients found in livestock manure is a sort of no-brainer. But if you aren’t testing manure for nutrient content, you have to depend on published “book values” to estimate nutrients applied from manure application. This can result in significant miscalculation of nutrients actually applied.

There are several factors to consider when attempting to fine-tune your nutrient credit from manure application, including manure nutrient content at the time of application, manure application rate and nutrient losses during and after application. The first item of concern is the manure nutrient content at the time of application. Without a good estimate of the nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium content of the applied manure, application rate and percent of nutrient loss will also be less meaningful.

Let’s be clear, using book values for manure nutrient content is a better practice than failing to consider manure nutrients. Every farmer keeping animals should be familiar with the Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development’s Manure Management GAAMP (Generally Accepted Agricultural Management Practices). This document provides good guidelines for estimating manure nutrient content, losses during scraping, handling and spreading, as well as nutrient needs of most common Michigan crops. Also included are instructions for completing a manure management system plan. This plan will be specific to your farm and especially important if a manure-related complaint is filed against your farm.

Another place to find very useful book values is the Midwest Plan Service’s “Manure Characteristics” publication. It includes tables for liquid pit manure generated by several livestock species with pounds of nutrient per 1,000 gallons listed. Solid manure information is also included in terms of pounds per ton.

However, the best way to make efficient use of manure nutrients is to have manure from your farm tested for nutrient content. Several certified laboratories are available, with a typical cost of around $30 per sample for a basic analysis. It is important to use proper collection technique when the sample is collected. The lab you select will have instructions on their website.

An on-farm demonstration was conducted involving five Michigan’s Upper Peninsula dairy farms to highlight the difference between book values and nutrient values determined by sampling and testing. Water content of the stored manure is a big factor. Rations fed to cattle or other livestock will also affect manure nutrient content. The following results show that some manures will closely resemble the book value, while others will be very different.

 

Difference between book values and nutrient values from Upper Peninsula dairy farms

Source of nutrients

N lb/1,000 gal

% of book value

P lb/1,000 gal

% of book value

K lb/1,000 gal

% of book value

Book value (MWPS-18: liquid pit – dairy herd)

31

15

22

Nachtman Farm (avg. values)

15

48

8

53

22

100

Tuinstra Farm (avg. values)

24

77

11

73

29

132

Herioux Farm (avg. values)

31

100

15

100

27

123

Lindberg Farm (avg. values)

35

113

18

120

54

245

Kronemeier Farm (avg. values)

32

103

14

93

27

123

If manure is a significant source of crop nutrients on your farm, Michigan State University Extension recommends you have it tested annually following recommended sampling procedures. With the current low commodity prices, the cost of manure sampling in time and cash, along with good manure storage, handling, application and incorporation practices, can be a very good investment.

Source: msu.edu


Trending Video

Wisconsin Corn and Soybean Weed Management Updates and Considerations for 2026 and Beyond

Video: Wisconsin Corn and Soybean Weed Management Updates and Considerations for 2026 and Beyond


Dr. Rodrigo Werle, associate professor and extension weed scientist, UW–Madison, shares the latest updates and future considerations for corn and soybean weed management in Wisconsin. This presentation covers herbicide resistance trends in waterhemp, including newly confirmed cases of HPPD and S-metolachlor resistance, and emphasizes the importance of residual herbicides and strategic tank mixes for consistent control. Rodrigo also introduces upcoming technologies like Vyconic soybeans and new herbicide products, discusses integrated weed management strategies such as planting green with cover crops, and highlights practical recommendations for 2026 and beyond.

At University of Wisconsin–Madison Division of Extension, we are working to integrate accessibility into our web, video, and audio content. If you experience accessibility barriers using our web, audio, or video content or would like to request complete captions, alternative languages, or other alternative formats, please contact us at accessibility@extension.wisc.edu. You will receive a response within 3 business days. There’s no added cost to you for these services.

The University of Wisconsin-Madison Division of Extension provides equal opportunities in employment and programming in compliance with state and federal law.