Ontario Corn Hybrid DON Screening Trials and Tar Spot research to strengthen risk management for growers

Mar 26, 2026

GUELPH — Ontario corn growers will soon have better tools and data to help them manage two of the crop’s most significant risks, DON mycotoxin contamination and tar spot.

A new, five-year project will allow the continuation of annual assessments of DON across corn hybrids through the Ontario Corn Committee (OCC). It will also fund University of Guelph DON and Tar Spot research to improve disease modeling accuracy and hybrid resistance screening tools.

By developing and refining these disease prediction tools and hybrid screening resources, growers will have improved knowledge to select the best corn hybrids for their specific needs and better manage the two diseases, ultimately improving crop yields and profitability.

“Our government is proud to support the Grain Farmers of Ontario as they develop innovative tools that will help protect corn crop production and help farmers across the province be more profitable,” said Trevor Jones, Minister of Agriculture, Food and Agribusiness. “This predictive and risk-mitigating tool is enabled by the research infrastructure, collaboration and world class innovation that exists right here in Ontario.”

Project Details

Led through a partnership with OCC and Professors Dr. Dave Hooker and Dr. Gursahib Singh at the Ridgetown Campus of the University of Guelph, the project is supported by the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Agri-Business (OMAFA) with additional funding for the OCC DON trials coming from the Ontario Agri-Business Association, Greenfield Ethanol, Ingredion, Ontario Pork, Suncor, Alco Energy Canada and participating seed companies. It will involve field trials at the University of Guelph’s Ridgetown Campus and the Huron Research Centre in Exeter.

“This initiative is an important investment in the future of Ontario’s corn production,” said Dr. Josh Cowan, director, research, Grain Farmers of Ontario. “By leveraging cutting-edge research and data, we’re empowering Ontario’s farmers to make more informed decisions, reduce risks, and ultimately increase the sustainability and profitability of their operations.”

Acknowledgments and Funding:

We gratefully acknowledge the Government of Ontario, Alco Energy Canada, Greenfield Ethanol, Ontario Pork, Suncor, Ingredion, participating seed corn companies, the Ontario Agribusiness Association (OABA), and Agricultural Research and Innovation Ontario (ARIO) for their financial support and for providing research station infrastructure essential to the completion of this work.

Source : GFO

Video: Turning Plant Defense Into a Management Strategy

Turning Plant Defense Into a Management Strategy

Understanding how a plant responds to stress is one thing.

Using that knowledge to make better management decisions is another.

Systemic acquired resistance, or SAR, is the plant's more direct defense response. When stress or infection occurs, the plant begins signaling throughout its system and preparing defensive compounds.

But if we know that response exists, can we help prepare the plant before the stress arrives?

The answer starts with understanding what triggers the response and what the plant needs to carry it out.

The Trigger and the Fuel

Salicylic acid plays an important role in triggering the SAR pathway.

Think of it as turning the truck on.

The engine may be running, but it still needs fuel to do the work.

In this case, manganese plays an important role in supporting the enzyme systems involved in the plant's defensive response.

This makes manganese status an important part of the conversation. Whether a producer is using tissue testing, sap analysis, or simply scouting for visible deficiency symptoms, the goal is to make sure the plant has adequate manganese available.

Manganese is required in relatively small amounts, but that does not make its role small.

If the plant receives a signal to defend itself but lacks the nutrition needed to support that response, it may struggle to carry out the process efficiently.

The trigger matters.

The fuel matters too.

Prepare Before the Stress Arrives

The best time to think about stress management is before the plant is overwhelmed.

Once a crop is already struggling, management can quickly turn into a game of catch-up.

This is similar to nitrogen management. Once a plant becomes severely deficient, correcting the problem does not necessarily erase the time and yield potential already lost.

Plant defense can work the same way.

Low-rate, targeted approaches designed to support the SAR pathway may fit best ahead of an expected stress event rather than after significant damage has already occurred.

That requires producers to think about predictable stress.

We may not know exactly what the weather will do tomorrow, but we generally know summer heat is coming. We know certain field conditions increase disease pressure. We know a herbicide application can temporarily stress a crop as the plant processes the chemistry.

Even a properly timed and labeled herbicide application can create a temporary response in the plant.

That does not mean the herbicide is bad.

Weeds can create significantly more yield loss than the temporary stress caused by controlling them.

The question is not whether we should eliminate every stressor.

The question is whether we can better prepare the plant to manage necessary and predictable stress.

Not All Stress Is Bad

Stress is a normal part of plant growth.

A perfectly stress-free environment does not exist in the field.

In fact, some stress is necessary for normal plant development. A plant responds to wind, temperature, moisture, sunlight, and countless other environmental signals throughout the season.

The environment is stress.

The plant's job is to manage it.

Problems begin when the stress load becomes greater than the plant's ability to respond.

Extreme heat, drought, high salt concentrations, disease pressure, and even certain management practices can add to that load.

This is where understanding SAR becomes useful.

Instead of waiting until the plant is visibly struggling, producers can begin identifying periods when stress is likely and make management decisions around those windows.

ISR Starts With the Soil

While SAR is a more direct defense response, induced systemic resistance, or ISR, brings the conversation back to soil health.

The longevity of a farm is closely connected to the health of its soil.

Carbon plays a major role because it supports biological life within the soil. Bacteria, fungi, and other organisms interact with plant roots and influence how the plant grows, accesses nutrients, and prepares for stress.

This is why soil health cannot be reduced to one product or one application.

It is a system.

Keeping living plants in the field longer can support biological activity. Cover crops may fit some operations. Better water management can improve soil conditions.