Farms.com Home   News

Strike Averted at Alberta Cargill Plant

It was not an emphatic stamp of approval, but employees at the Cargill processing plant in High River, AB have accepted a new contract just in time to prevent a work stoppage.

Workers voted 71% in favour of the contract offer, which includes more money and an improvement in benefits. After a previous contract was rejected by a margin of 98%, workers were prepared to walk off the job beginning Monday.

According to United Food and Commercial Workers Local 401, the contract is the “best of its kind and presented unprecedented gains in this time of economic and political uncertainty and during the biggest health crisis the world has ever seen.” Local 401 previously reported the offer included as much as $4,200 in retroactive pay for many Cargill union members, a $1,000 signing bonus, a $1,000 COVID-19 bonus and a more than a $6,000 total bonus for many members. The deal also included a $5/hour wage increase (21% over the contract) for many employees.

In a statement following the contract approval, Local 401 officials said the union is also calling for reforms and restructuring in the meatpacking industry.

The High River plant, which processes up to one-third of all Canadian beef, was the site of a major COVID-19 outbreak last year. There was a second outbreak at the plant earlier this year.

Click here to see more...

Trending Video

Michigan Cover Crop Decision Tool Update 2026

Video: Michigan Cover Crop Decision Tool Update 2026

Abigail Smith, NRCS State Agronomist, Monica Jean, MSU Extension Field Crops Educator, and Madelyn Cleovsky, MSU Extension Conservation Agronomist Educator, discuss 2025 updates made to MCCC’s Cover Crop Decision Tool for Michigan.

This material is based upon work that is supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, under agreement number 2023-38640-39573 through the North Central Region SARE program under project number ENC23-226. USDA is an equal opportunity employer and service provider. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy.